<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">lowmgou</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Московский юридический журнал</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Moscow Juridical Journal</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2949-5091</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2949-513X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>State University of Education</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18384/2310-6794-2020-4-133-138</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">lowmgou-139</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПОЗИЦИЯ ЗАРУБЕЖНОГО УЧЁНОГО</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>К ВОПРОСУ ОБ ОСОБЕННОСТЯХ СОВРЕМЕННОГО ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА ПО ЗАЩИТЕ ПЕРСОНАЛЬНЫХ ДАННЫХ (ВЗГЛЯД ЮРИСТА-ПРАКТИКА)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>ON THE ISSUE OF MODERN DATA PROTECTION LEGISLATION SPECIFICITY (LEGAL EXPERT’S POINT OF VIEW)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дыбова</surname><given-names>А. К.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Dybova</surname><given-names>A. C.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">agneschristian@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Папский католический университет Рио-де-Жанейро</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Pontifical Catholic University, Rio de Janeiro</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>02</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>133</fpage><lpage>138</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Дыбова А.К., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Дыбова А.К.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Dybova A.C.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.lawmgoujournal.ru/jour/article/view/139">https://www.lawmgoujournal.ru/jour/article/view/139</self-uri><abstract><p>Цель. Сопоставить законодательные нормы бразильского Общего закона о защите данных (LGPD) и европейского Общего Устава о защите данных (GDPR). Процедура и методы. В исследовании использовались методы анализа, сравнения, синтеза, компаративный и формально-юридический подходы. Результаты. Выявлены сходства, ключевые расхождения и особенности двух нормативных документов.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Aim. To compare the legislative rule of the Brazilian Law on General Data Protection (LGPD) and the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Methodology. The methods of analysis, synthesis, as well as the comparative and formal-legal methods were used in the research. Results. Similarities, key differences and specificity of the two normative documents are revealed.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>международное право</kwd><kwd>бразильское законодательство</kwd><kwd>нормативные акты</kwd><kwd>персональные данные</kwd><kwd>Общий закон о защите данных (LGPD)</kwd><kwd>Общий Устав о защите данных (GDPR)</kwd><kwd>Федеральный закон «О персональных данных»</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>international law</kwd><kwd>Brazilian legislation</kwd><kwd>normative acts</kwd><kwd>personal data</kwd><kwd>Law on General Data Protection (LGPD)</kwd><kwd>General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)</kwd><kwd>Federal Law “On Personal Data”</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
