<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">lowmgou</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Московский юридический журнал</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Moscow Juridical Journal</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2949-5091</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2949-513X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>State University of Education</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">lowmgou-357</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ГРАЖДАНСКОЕ ПРАВО; ПРЕДПРИНИМАТЕЛЬСКОЕ ПРАВО; СЕМЕЙНОЕ ПРАВО; МЕЖДУНАРОДНОЕ ЧАСТНОЕ ПРАВО</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CIVIL LAW; ENTREPRENEURIAL LAW; FAMILY LAW; INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ПРИНЦИП ЧЕСТНОЙ ДЕЛОВОЙ ПРАКТИКИ В ПРЕЦЕДЕНТНОМ ПРАВЕ АВСТРАЛИИ И ВЕЛИКОБРИТАНИИ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>THE PRINCIPLE OF FAIR DEALING IN AUSTRALIAN AND BRITISH CASE LAW</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Барышников</surname><given-names>Иван Сергеевич</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Baryshnikov</surname><given-names>I. .</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">bis.92@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Российская правовая академия Министерства юстиции Российской Федерации</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Russian Law Academy of the Russian Federation Ministry of Justice</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2015</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>05</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>62</fpage><lpage>68</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Барышников И.С., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Барышников И.С.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Baryshnikov I...</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.lawmgoujournal.ru/jour/article/view/357">https://www.lawmgoujournal.ru/jour/article/view/357</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье приведены результаты анализа содержания и понятия принципа честной деловой практики в юрисдикциях «общего права». Автор, основываясь на доктрине и прецедентной практике Австралии и Великобритании, выявляет общие черты и различия, присущие пониманию и применению этого принципа в названных правопорядках. Приводятся примеры конкретных судебных решений, лежащих в основе возникновения и развития данного принципа. Основываясь на зарубежном опыте, автор дает рекомендации по совершенствованию действующего гражданского законодательства Российской Федерации.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article analyses the notion of the principle of fair dealing in common law jurisdictions. The author identifies the commonalities and differences in understanding the principle of fair dealing in Australian and British case law. The examples of concrete cases lying at the heart of the emergence and development of fair dealing doctrine are provided. The recommendations to elaborate the current civil law of the Russian Federation are given.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>добросовестность</kwd><kwd>честная деловая практика</kwd><kwd>принципы права</kwd><kwd>прецедентная практика</kwd><kwd>реформа гражданского законодательства</kwd><kwd>conscientiousness</kwd><kwd>fair dealing</kwd><kwd>principles of law</kwd><kwd>case law</kwd><kwd>civil law reform</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bedfordshire v Fitzpatrick / Lexis Web. co.uk. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://lexisweb.co.uk/cases/1998/october/bedfordshire-county-council-v-fitzpatrick-contractors-ltd (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bedfordshire v Fitzpatrick / Lexis Web. co.uk. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://lexisweb.co.uk/cases/1998/october/bedfordshire-county-council-v-fitzpatrick-contractors-ltd (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Burger King Corporation v Hungry Jack Pty Ltd / wikiJuris [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://wikijuris.net/cases/burger_king_v_hungry_jacks_2001 (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burger King Corporation v Hungry Jack Pty Ltd / wikiJuris [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://wikijuris.net/cases/burger_king_v_hungry_jacks_2001 (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Compass Group UK and Ireland Ltd v Mid Essex Hospital Service NHS Trust / LexisWeb.co.uk. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://lexisweb.co.uk/cases/2012/march/compass-group-uk-and-ireland-ltd-ta-medirest-v-mid-essex-hospital-services-nhs-trust (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Compass Group UK and Ireland Ltd v Mid Essex Hospital Service NHS Trust / LexisWeb.co.uk. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://lexisweb.co.uk/cases/2012/march/compass-group-uk-and-ireland-ltd-ta-medirest-v-mid-essex-hospital-services-nhs-trust (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">CPG Group Ltd v Qatari Diar Real Estate Investment Company / LexisWeb. co.uk. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://lexisweb.co.uk/cases/2010/june/cpc-group-ltd-v-qatari-diar-real-estate-investment-company (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">CPG Group Ltd v Qatari Diar Real Estate Investment Company / LexisWeb. co.uk. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://lexisweb.co.uk/cases/2010/june/cpc-group-ltd-v-qatari-diar-real-estate-investment-company (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dutch Civil Code / Dutch Civil Law [Электронный ресурс]. 2014. URL: http://www.dutchcivillaw.com/civilcodebook066.htm (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dutch Civil Code / Dutch Civil Law [Электронный ресурс]. 2014. URL: http://www.dutchcivillaw.com/civilcodebook066.htm (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Finn P. Commerce, the Common Law and Morality // Melbourne University Law Review. 1989. Vol. 17 (Iss. 1). Р. 87-99.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Finn P. Commerce, the Common Law and Morality // Melbourne University Law Review. 1989. Vol. 17 (Iss. 1). Р. 87-99.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">German Civil Code / Bundesministeriums der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/englisch_bgb.html (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">German Civil Code / Bundesministeriums der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/englisch_bgb.html (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Interfoto Picture Library v Stiletto Visual Programmer Ltd / LegalMax [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.legalmax.info/members2/conbook/interfot.htm (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Interfoto Picture Library v Stiletto Visual Programmer Ltd / LegalMax [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.legalmax.info/members2/conbook/interfot.htm (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mason A. Contract, Good Faith and Equitable Standarts of Fair Dealing // Law Quarterly Review. 2000. № 116. Р. 66-94.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mason A. Contract, Good Faith and Equitable Standarts of Fair Dealing // Law Quarterly Review. 2000. № 116. Р. 66-94.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mina R. A Franchiser’s Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing // FindLaw Australia [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/742/a-franchiser8217s-duty-of-good-faith-and-fair-deal.aspx (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mina R. A Franchiser’s Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing // FindLaw Australia [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/742/a-franchiser8217s-duty-of-good-faith-and-fair-deal.aspx (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Renard Construction Pty v Minister of Public Works / wikiJuris [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://wikijuris.net/cases/renard_v_mpw_1992 (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Renard Construction Pty v Minister of Public Works / wikiJuris [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://wikijuris.net/cases/renard_v_mpw_1992 (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thomas D. Contractual obligations of good faith // Construction Law International. 2012. Vol. 7 (Iss. 3). Р. 31-34.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thomas D. Contractual obligations of good faith // Construction Law International. 2012. Vol. 7 (Iss. 3). Р. 31-34.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Walford v Miles / LegalMax [Электронный ресурс]. - URL: http://www.legalmax.info/members2/conbook/walford_.htm (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Walford v Miles / LegalMax [Электронный ресурс]. - URL: http://www.legalmax.info/members2/conbook/walford_.htm (дата обращения: 14.04.2015 г.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
