Subject and Limits of the Prosecutor’s Criminalistic Thinking in Pre-Trial Criminal Proceedings
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-513X-2024-2-98-106
Abstract
Aim. Assessment of the content, orientation and significance of the criminalistic thinking of the prosecutor participating in pre-trial criminal proceedings.
Methodology. The key research method was the content analysis of Russian legislation and the point of view of criminologists regarding the definition of the concept, essence and content of criminalistic thinking in solving problems. arising in the process of solving and investigating a crime. Comparative legal and logical-legal methods were used. as well as the method of system analysis.
Results. The author’s position on the criminalistic thinking of a prosecutor participating in criminal proceedings as a necessary component of his professional intelligence is substantiated. The author’s definition of the concept of criminalistic thinking of a prosecutor is formulated, the scope, directions and goals of its use in pre-trial criminal proceedings in modern legal conditions are characterized, the stages of its formation, the importance of generalization, analysis, and use of relevant positive experience in prosecutorial practice are considered.
Research implications. Theoretically justified the use of forensic capabilities in prosecutorial supervisory activities. The relevance, practical significance of the prosecutor’s forensic thinking in ensuring proper efficiency of supervision in pre-trial criminal proceedings, the need to expand the limits of its use by establishing in the law a wider range of supervisory powers of the prosecutor at this stage of the criminal process have been proven.
About the Author
V. N. Isaenko
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vjacheslav N. Isaenko – Dr. Sci. (Law), Prof., Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics,
10A, ul. Radio, Moscow 105005.
References
1. Bakhteyev D. V. Kontseptualnyye osnovy teorii kriminalisticheskogo myshleniya i ispolzovaniya sistem iskusstvennogo intellekta v rassledovanii prestupleniy: avtoref. dis. … dokt. yurid. nauk [Conceptual Foundations of the Theory of Forensic Thinking and the Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems in Crime Investigation: Dr. Sci thesis in Law sciences]. Yekaterinburg, 2022. 42 p.
2. Gorshenin L. N. Teoriya kriminalisticheskogo prognozirovaniya : dis. … dokt. yurid. nauk [Theory of Forensic Forecasting: Dr. Sci thesis in Law sciences]. Minsk, 1994. 330 p.
3. Komarov I. M., Lakomskaya M. Yu. Problemnyye situatsii prestupleniy i ikh razresheniye posredstvom takticheskikh operatsiy [Problem Situations in Crime Investigation and Their Resolution Through Tactical Operations]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2021. 186 p.
4. Korenevsky Yu. V. Kriminalistika dlya sudebnykh sledstviy [Forensic Science for Forensic Investigation]. Moscow, CenterYurInfor Publ., 2001. 198 p.
5. Pavlov R. Yu., Bessonov A. A. Kriminalisticheskoye myshleniye sledovatelya [Forensic Thinking of an Investigator]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2023. 168 p.
6. Rokhlin V. I. Vospitaniye kultury prokurorskikh rabotnikov kak neobkhodimoye usloviye osushchestvleniya prokurorskogo nadzora v formiruyemom pravovom gosudarstve [Fostering the Legal Culture of Prosecutor’s Employees as a Necessary Condition for the Implementation of Prosecutor’s Supervision in the Forming Rule of Law State]. St. Petersburg, 2001. 67 p.
7. Shutemova T. V. [Forensic Thinking of the Prosecutor]. In: Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta imeni V. N. Tatishcheva [Bulletin of the Volga University named after V. N. Tatishchev], 2018, no. 4, vol. 2, pp. 205–211.
8. Yablokov N. P. [Situational Approach as One of the Methods of Scientific Knowledge in Forensic Thinking of Subjects of Forensic Activity]. In: Volchetskaya T. S., ed. Aktual'nye problemy ispol'zovaniya situacionnogo podhoda v yuridicheskoj nauke, v pravoprimenitel'noj deyatel'nosti: mat-ly konf. [Actual Problems of Using the Situational Approach in Legal Science, in Law Enforcement Activity]. Kaliningrad, 2012, pp. 20–25.
Review
Views:
104
Email this article 