On the Issue of Liability for Trade Special Economic Measures Violation
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-513X-2024-4-27-34
Abstract
Aim. To study the problem of holding persons liable for violation of special economic measures and measures of influence (counteraction) when exporting certain categories of goods outside the territory of the Russian Federation and (or) importing them into the territory of the Russian Federation.
Methodology. During the study, the regulatory acts that form the basis for the application of special economic measures, in particular trade prohibitions and restrictions, were analyzed. The researchers’ views on the nature of sanctions and countermeasures were presented. The judicial practice on the issues of qualification of offenses related to circumvention of anti-sanction prohibitions and restrictions was studied.
Results. The conducted research showed that the specificity of special economic measures and measures of influence requires the introduction of specific rules establishing liability for their violation.
Research implication. The information about trade bans and restrictions, which were introduced to counteract sanctions made by unfriendly states as the justification to introduce special rules on liability for violating or circumventing these measures, was generalized.
About the Author
E. V. Ermolaeva
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena V. Ermolaeva – Cand . Sci . (Law), Departmentally Head), Department of Constitutional and Civil Law, Faculty of Law
ul. Radio 10A, Moscow 105005
References
1. Baitin M. I. Sushchnost prava (Sovremennoye normativnoye pravoponimaniye na rubezhe dvukh stoletiy) [The Essence of Law (Modern Normative Legal Understanding on the Verge of Two Centuries)]. Saratov, SGAP Publ., 2001. 416 p.
2. Gabov A. V. [Anti-Sanction Measures in Russian Law]. In: Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN [Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS], 2023, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 96–141. DOI: 10.35427/2073-4522-2023-18-3
3. Gumenyuk V. P. Problems of Bringing to Administrative and Legal Liability for Violations of the regime for the implementation of counter-sanctions of the Russian Federation]. In: Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii [Bulletin of the Russian Customs Academy], 2019, no. 3, pp. 137–144.
4. Dyumulin I. I. [Non-tariff Measures in Modern International Trade: Some Issues of Theory, Practice and WTO Rules, Interests of Russia]. In: Rossiyskiy vneshneekonomicheskiy vestnik [Russian Foreign Economic Journal], 2016, no. 2, pp. 3–20.
5. Lvova L. N. [Improving the Sanctions Legislation of the Russian Federation in Order to Increase the Efficiency of Economic Security]. In: Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta kooperatsii [Vestnik of the Russian University of Cooperation], 2022, no. 4, pp. 101–105.
6. Mozhegorova O. A. [Analysis of the System of Prohibitions and Restrictions on Foreign Trade Activities of the Eurasian Economic Union]. In: Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii [Bulletin of the Russian Customs Academy], 2019, no. 2, pp. 72–79.
7. Sinitsina S. V. [Object of an Administrative Offense as a Set of Social Relations Regulated by Legal Norms and Protected by Administrative Liability Measures]. In: Nauka i sovremennost [Science and Modernity], 2015, no. 35, pp. 238–244.
8. Timofeev I. N. [Counteracting Economic Sanctions: Russian Legislative and Institutional Experience]. In: Finansovyy zhurnal [Financial Journal], 2021, no. 4, pp. 8–23.
9. Timofeev I. N. [Economic Sanctions as a Political Concept]. In: Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta [Bulletin of MGIMO-University], 2018, no. 2, pp. 26–42. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2018-2-59-26-42
Review
Views:
109
Email this article 