Reproductive Rights Through the Lens of the Practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-513X-2025-1-42-52
Abstract
Aim. To analyze approaches of scientists and practitioners in the field of reproductive rights, identification of the legal nature of these rights and the limits of constitutional legal protection in the Russian Federation through the prism of modern practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.
Methodology. The main method of scientific research was the formal-legal method, which was used to analyze the provisions of existing legal acts on the consolidation and implementation of human reproductive rights, as well as the judicial practice of their application. General scientific methods: the method of analysis, generalization, the logical method, etc., were also used in the study.
Results. The study made it possible to formulate provisions regarding the legal nature of reproductive rights, the specifics of their implementation and protection, based on the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.
Research implication. The results of the study can be useful for further research on reproductive rights and freedoms, as well as for law enforcement agencies.
About the Author
Yu. K. Makeeva
Russian State University of Justice named after V. M. Lebedev
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia K. Makeeva – Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof., Department of Constitutional Law named after N. V. Vitruk
Moscow
References
1. Burmistrova, E. V. (2024). Legal Regulation Features of Posthumous Reproductive Programs in Russia. In: Modern Law, 4, 79–82 (in Russ.).
2. Vasilevich, D. G., Potapenko, S. V., Goncharov, V. V., Savchenko, M. S. (2025). Reproductive Rights: Concept, Legal Nature, and Essence. In: Law and State: The Theory and Practice, 1, 149–152 (in Russ.).
3. Kolesova, N. S. (2020). Human Rights and Demographic Processes. Moscow, Norma publ., INFRA-M publ. (in Russ.).
4. Kruss, V. I. (2023). Medical Law, Constitutional Exercise, and Somatic Rights. In: Constitutional and Municipal Law, 4, 8-18 (in Russ.).
5. Posadkova, M. V. (2022). The Future is Already Here: On the Constitutional Nature of the Reproductive Right to Give Birth Using Assistive Technologies. In: Comparative Constitutional Review, 6, 72–94 (in Russ.).
6. Troitskaya, A. A. & Shevchenko, O. S. (2025). Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Non-Obvious Limits of Protection. In: Comparative Constitutional Review, 1, 163–183 (in Russ.).
7. Shatilina, A. S. (2021). Constitutional and Legal Dimension of Reproductive Health: Terra Incognita? In: Constitutional and Municipal Law, 3, 51–57 (in Russ.).
8. Zorkin, V. D. (2024). Lectures on Law and the State. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).
9. Varlamova, N. V. (2024). Human Rights: Theoretical Justification and Legal and Dogmatic Concretization. Moscow: Institute of State and Law publ. (in Russ.).
10. Gritsenko, E. V., Dolzhikov, A. V., Dudko, I. A., et. al. (2024). Constitutional Rights in Russia: Judicial Practice and Comparative Materials. Moscow: Centre for Constitutional Studies publ. (in Russ.).
11. Sargsyan, V. V. (2024). Post-Mortem Interests: Legal Foundations and Types. In: Inheritance Law, 4, 9–12 (in Russ.).
12. Veliyeva, S. M. (2024). Legal Regulation of Reproductive Rights as a Kind of Somatic Rights. In: Modern Law, 11, 80–84 (in Russ.).
13. Tarusina, N. N. (2024). On Current Construction Variations of the Consent in the Family Legal Sphere. In: Family and Housing Law, 5, 18–21 (in Russ.).
Review
Views:
74
Email this article 