The System of Principles of Bio-Law: Features of Structure and Interconnections
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-513X-2026-1-19-29
Abstract
Aim. To form an idea of the emerging concept of the bio-law system.
Methodology. Various research methods were used. To achieve the set goal, comparative and systemicstructural methods were chosen as the key ones.
Results. It has been established that the development of a system of bio-law principles is based on an interdisciplinary and intersectoral approach. The system of bio-law principles is characterized as complex. It incorporates principles of bioethics, constitutional principles, environmental protection principles, biosafety principles, bioeconomic principles, and technical regulation principles as legal complexes. It is determined that the development of a system of bio-law principles is based on an integrative approach that makes the unification of various components into a single, coherent structure possible. It is noted that the system of bio-law principles is dynamic and evolving.
Research implications. This study aims to advance the theory of public law. It presents a coherent justification for the emerging structure of the bio-law principles and the prospects for its development.
About the Author
I. A. Aleshkova
Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina A. Aleshkova – Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof., Leading Researcher, Department of Legal Studies
Moscow
References
1. Tsomartova, F. V., ed. (2021). Law and Biomedicine. Moscow: ILCL publ., Norm publ., INFRA-M publ. (in Russ.).
2. Bryukhina, E. R., Tretyakova, E. S., Zenin, S. S., et al. (2024). Bio-Law, Biotechnology, Human Rights: Theoretical, Legal and Ethical Problems. Moscow: Prospect publ. (in Russ.).
3. Crouch, M., ed. (2025). Medical Genetics and Law: An International Perspective. Cham: Springer Nature.
4. Afanasyev, S. D., Tereshchenko, I. A. & Yatskevich, D. A. (2022). Biometric Identification and Human Rights: Demarcation Line. In: Law, 3, 33–46. DOI: 10.37239/0869-4400-2022-18-3-33-46 (in Russ.).
5. Mokhov, A. A. (2021). Bioethics and Bio-Law as Bioeconomy Regulators. In: Kutafin Law Review, 8, 68–84. DOI: 10.17803/2313-5395.2021.1.15.068-084.
6. Kubyshkin, A. V. (2024). Theoretical Aproaches to the Regulation of bioeconomy. In: Lex Genetica, 3, 7–25. DOI: 10.17803/lexgen-2024-3-3-7-25 (in Russ.).
7. Zenin, S. S. & Nekrasov, M. A. (2024). Somatic Biotechnologies in the System of Social Values of Modern Russian Society. In: Actual Problems of Russian Law, 1, 22–32. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2024.158.1.022-032 (in Russ.).
8. Pestrikova, A. A. & Smorchkova, L. N. (2022). Features of Institutions of Informed Consent and Property Rights in the Legal Regulation of Relations Related to Human Biological Material. In: Actual Problems of Russian Law, 12, 110–120. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2022.145.12.110-120 (in Russ.).
9. Mokhov, A. A. (2022). Bio-Law and the Strategy for Its Development in the Russian Federation. In: Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2, 201–210. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2022.135.2.201-210 (in Russ.).
10. Ponomareva, D. V. (2024). Lex Genomica in the Digital Age: On the Issue of Balancing Private and Public Interests and the Convergence of Law and Ethics. In: Law and Digital Economy, 2, 26–35 (in Russ.).
11. Umnova-Konyukhova, I. A. (2025). The Right to Health: Topical Aspects of Nature, Content and Regulation in International and National Law. In: Social and Humanitarian sciences: Domestic and Foreign Literature. Series 4: State and Law, 2, 7–25. DOI: 10.31249/iajpravo/2025.02.01 (in Russ.).
12. Komarova, V. V. (2025). Biotechnology and Their Role in the Realization of the Human Right to Life and the Right to Health. In: Social and Humanitarian sciences: Domestic and Foreign Literature. Series 4: State and Law, 2, 38–50. DOI: 10.31249/iajpravo/2025.02.03 (in Russ.).
13. Bryukhina, E. R. & Tretyakova, E. S. (2023). Legal and Theoretical Justification of Bioethics and Biological Law in Their Relationship and Interaction. In: Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 4, 568–589. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2023-62-568-589 (in Russ.).
14. Krylatova, I. Yu. (2023). On Consolidating and Implementing the Constitutional Right to Individual Dignity: Legal and Bioethical aspects. In: Russian Justice, 6, 53–59. DOI: 10.52433/01316761_2023_0 6_53 (in Russ.).
15. Rendtorff, J. D. (2002). Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Bio-Law: Autonomy, Dignity, Integrity and Vulnerability towards a Foundation of Bioethics and Bio-Law. In: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 5, 235–244. DOI: 10.1023/a:1021132602330.
16. Kravets, I. A. (2022). Bio-Constitutionalism as a Legal and Ethical Category: Subject Area and Problem Area of Legal Regulation. In: Legal Problems of Strengthening Russian Statehood. Tomsk, 78–79 (in Russ.).
17. Kravets, I. A. (2025). Bioethical Constitutionalism as a New Vector for the Development of a Legal and Existential Worldview in the Era of Genetic Information and the Bio-Jurisprudence of Human Rights. In: Juridical Science and Practice, 21-3, 27–44. DOI: 10.25205/2542-0410-2025-21-3-27-44 (in Russ.).
18. Barišić, P. (2025). Bioethical Principles in the Vortex of Law. In: Bioethics and Social Ethics in The Modern World. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
19. Valdes E. Biolaw: Origins, Doctrine and Juridical Applications on the Biosciences. Cham: Springer, 2021. P. 59-84. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-71823-7.
20. Mokhov, A. A. (2021). Bioethics and Bio-Law as Bioeconomy Regulators. In: Kutafin Law Review, 8, 68–84. DOI: 10.17803/2313-5395.2021.1.15.068-084.
Review
Views:
78
JATS XML
Email this article 