MURDER: THINKING ABOUT CRIME AND PUNISHMENT
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6794-2021-4-96-106
Abstract
Aim. To investigate the concept of «murder» and measures of liability under the current criminal legislation of the Russian Federation. Methodology. In the work, the dialectical method is fundamental, system-structural, formal-logical (induction, deduction, abdication, etc.) were also used. Results. The article is devoted to criminological and criminal-legal understanding of murders, their main features. It is alleged that the murder loses life, the whole person, and not only the person as a product of social relations. It is alleged that human life is the main object of all criminal law protection. A typology of homicides is offered. Restrictions are given on killings under Art. 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, from other types of killings. Research implications. The author’s concept of the concept of “murder” is presented. In addition, the essence and functions of punishment for murder are specified. The resulting provisions and conclusions could be used in the further development of related issues, such as the criminal law mechanism; the qualification of criminal conduct; sentencing, etc.
About the Author
Y. M. Antonyan
All-Russian Research Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Авдеева Е. В. Спорные вопросы квалификации убийства, совершенного в состоянии аффекта // Российский следователь. 2019. № 1. С. 29-32.
2. Бородин С. В. Преступления против жизни. СПб.: Юридический центр Пресс, 2003. 465 с.
3. Горностаева И. В. Уголовно-правовое и криминологическое значение аффекта: автореф. дис.. канд. юрид. наук. М., 2008. 25 с.
4. Карабанова Е. Н. Квалификация многообъектного преступления по мотиву и цели // Российская юстиция. 2018. № 1. С. 31-34.
5. Лопашенко Н. А. Снижение репрессивности уголовного закона: предлагаемые меры и их оценка // Уголовное право. 2017. № 4. С. 84-93.
6. Лопашенко Н. А. Убийства. М.: Юрлитинформ, 2013. 540 с.
7. Малинин В. Б. Убийство: уголовно-правовая характеристика. СПб.: Юридический центр Пресс, 2015. 728 с.
8. Наумов А. В. Мотивы убийства. Волгоград, 1969. 134 с.
9. Рарог А. И. Цели наказания в науке уголовного права // Актуальные проблемы российского права. 2021. № 2. С. 125-139.
10. Стешич Е. С. Криминология гомицида. М.: Юрлитинформ, 2019. 491 с.
11. Суходольская Ю. В. Субкультуризация массового убийства в образовательных организациях как новый российский криминологический феномен // Законность. 2020. № 10. С. 37-40.
12. Deegan S. J. The Meaning of Murder: Family Members in the Lives of Juvenile Homicide Offenders // The British Journal of Criminology. 2021. Vol. 61. Iss. 1. P. 85-103.
13. De Souza Dias T. Accessibility and Foreseeability in the Application of the Principle of Legality under General International Law: A Time for Revision? // Human Rights Law Review. 2019. Vol. 19. Iss. 4. P. 649-674.
14. Guercke L. State Responsibility for a Failure to Prevent Violations of the Right to Life by Organised Criminal Groups: Disappearances in Mexico // Human Rights Law Review. 2021. Vol. 21. Iss. 2. P. 329-357.
15. Matravers M. Remaindered Culpability: Comment on Fundamentals of Criminal Law // Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies. 2021. Vol. 23. Iss. 1. P. 138-148.
16. O’Loughlin A. Risk Reduction and Redemption: An Interpretive Account of the Right to Rehabilitation in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2021. Vol. 41. Iss. 2. P. 510-538.
Review
Views:
187
Email this article 