Preview

Moscow Juridical Journal

Advanced search

PROBLEMS OF ENSURING AND PROTECTING THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION OF THE WILL OF THE LAW-MAKING SUBJECT IN THE ERA OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATIONS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6794-2022-1-39-49

Abstract

Aim. To find out the problems of ensuring and protecting freedom of expression as a factor of law-making in the era of the new technological revolution and propose ways to overcome them.

Methodology. The methods of analysis and synthesis are used to represent the essence of the problems that have arisen in lawmaking in the conditions of changing technological patterns. The inductive method made it possible to study the positions of a number of schools of jurisprudence on the interpretation of threats to the freedom of expression of will to the subject of law-making. In the course of the study, the method of comparative jurisprudence was used, with the help of which it was possible to present a mechanism for ensuring and protecting freedom of expression as a category of the theory of lawmaking.

The general scientific dialectical method has become an effective tool for cognizing the natural phenomenon of the law-making process - freedom of expression.

Results. It is suggested that the era of digitalization will not destroy the idea of a person as a subject of law-making: he will not lose the status of the creator (creator) of the rule of law, and freedom of expression as a factor of law-making will be ensured and preserved.

Research implications. The ways of ensuring and protecting the freedom of expression of will as a factor of law-making of the subject of law-making in the era of digital transformations and mass use of artificial intelligence are determined.

About the Author

T. Krupnova
Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Tatiana B. Krupnova – Lecturer, Department of Theory of Law and State-Legal Disciplines, International Law Institute, postgraduate student, Department of Theory of Law and Interdisciplinary Studies

Bolshaya Cheremushkinskaya ul. 34, Moscow117218, Russian Federation



References

1. Arkhipov V. V., Naumov V. B. [Artificial intelligence and Autonomous devices in the context of rights: on the development of Russia]. In: Trudy SPIIRAN [Works of SPIIRAN], 2017, no. 6 (55), pp. 46–62.

2. Vorobeva I. V., Salakhutdinov V. D. [Problems of legal regulation of artificial intelligence]. In: Semenov A. V., ed. Malyshevskiye chteniya – 2020. Nauka i obrazovaniye: budushcheye i tseli ustoychivogo razvitiya: materialy XVI mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Ch. 4 [Malyshev readings 2020. Science and education: the future and goals of sustainable development: materials of the 16th International Scientific Conferences], Iss. 4. Moscow, 2020, pp. 62–72.

3. Gadzhiev G. A. [Is a robot an agent? (Search for legal forms to regulate the digital economy)]. In: Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian law], 2018, no. 1, pp. 15–30.

4. Gadzhiev G. A., Voinikanis E. A. [Can a robot be a subject of law? (Search for legal forms to regulate the digital economy)]. In: Pravo [Right], 2018, no. 4, pp. 24–48.

5. Glebov I. N. [Artificial legal mind]. In: Gumanitarnoe pravo [Humanitarian law]. Available at: https://humanlaw.ru/9-article/26-artificial-intelligence.html (accessed: 01.12.2022).

6. Ivanov V. G., Ignatovsky Ya. R. [Deepfakes: Political Perspectives and Threats to Personality and National Security]. In: Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipalnoe upravlenie [Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: State and Municipal Administration], 2020, no. 4, pp. 379–386.

7. Kerimov D. A. Metodologiya prava (predmet, funktsii, problemy filosofii prava) [Methodology of law (subject, functions, problems of philosophy of law)]. Moscow, Avanta+ Publ., 2001. 560 p.

8. Kiselev A. S. [On the need for legal regulation in the field of artificial intelligence: deepfake as a threat to national security]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Yurisprudentsiya [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Jurisprudence], 2021, no. 3, pp. 54–64.

9. Kornev A. V. [Digital technologies, legal risks and the problem of their minimization]. In: Aktualnye problemy rossiiskogo prava [Current problems of Russian law], 2021, vol. 16, no. 9 (130), pp. 11–20.

10. Krupnova T. B. [Freedom of expression of the will of the subject of lawmaking in the context of digital transformation of lawmaking: the experience of forecasting]. In: Evsikova E. V., Tikhomaeva V. S., eds. Sbornik statei po rezultatam mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Yuridicheskaya deyatelnost v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii» [Collection of articles based on the results of the international scientific and practical conference «Legal activity in the context of digitalization»]. Simferopol, ARIAL Publ., 2021, pp. 301–305.

11. Ovchinnikov A. I. [Law and legal awareness in the context of digitalization of society]. In: Vestnik yuridicheskogo fakulteta Yuzhnogo federalnogo universiteta [Journal of Law, Southern Federal University], 2020, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 131–134.

12. Pashentsev D. A., Alimova D. R. [Law-making innovations in the context of digitalization of public relations]. In: Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and law], 2019, no. 6, pp. 102–106.

13. Pashentsev D. A., Zaloilo M. V. [The impact of modern digital technologies on the content and nature of law-making activity: theoretical and legal aspect]. In: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii [Bulletin of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 2018, no. 4 (44), pp. 231–235.

14. Sokolova A. A. [Artificial intelligence in jurisprudence: implementation risks]. In: Yuridicheskaya tekhnika [Legal engineering], 2019, no. 13, pp. 350–357.

15. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Pravovoe regulirovanie: teoriya i praktika [Legal regulation: theory and practice]. Moscow, Formula prava Publ., 2008. 400 p.

16. Tikhomirov Yu. A., Nanba S. B. [Robotization: the dynamics of legal regulation]. In: Vestnik Sankt- Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo [Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Law], 2020, no. 3, pp. 532–549.

17. Khabrieva T. Ya. [The Venice Commission as a Subject of Interpretation of Law]. In: Khabrieva T. Ya. Izbrannye trudy. T. 1 [Selected works. Vol. 1]. Moscow, 2018, pp. 413–536.

18. Khabrieva T. Ya. [Right before the challenges of the digital reality]. In: Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2018, no. 9, pp. 5–16.

19. Khabrieva T. Ya., Chernogor N. N. Budushchee prava. Nasledie akademika V. S. Stepina i yuridicheskaya nauka [The future of law. The legacy of academician V. S. Stepin and legal science]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2020. 176 p.

20. Shidlovsky A. V., Zadorin M. Yu. [Natural law and artificial intelligence: on the way to the «digital Cambrian explosion»]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Yurisprudentsiya [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Jurisprudence], 2021, no. 3, pp. 39–53.

21. Tikhomirov Yu. A., Nanba S. B., eds. Yuridicheskaya kontseptsiya robotizatsii [Legal concept of robotization]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2019. 240 p.

22. Searle J. Minds, brains, and programs. In: Behavioral and brain sciences, 1980, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 417–424. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00005756


Review

Views: 262


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5091 (Print)
ISSN 2949-513X (Online)