THE RIGHT TO THE PHYSICAL EXISTENCE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: FICTION OR REALITY?
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6794-2022-3-85-91
Abstract
Aim. Analysis of the legal possibility of the right to artificial intelligence physical existence (AI ), which is actively being introduced into legal reality.
Methodology. The study uses the following methods: comparative-legal, historical, formal-logical, legal-dogmatic, as well as the methods of analysis and synthesis.
Results. Artificial intelligence, which has many interpretations depending on the spheres of its application in practice, has not yet reached the legal status of equal to human intelligence from the standpoint of constitutional law, and therefore at the moment it does not seem possible to classify it as a full-fledged subject of constitutional legal relations. At the same time, one cannot underestimate the theses that in the future artificial intelligence is able to become a full bearer of rights, freedoms and obligations, including the right to physical existence.
Research implications. The conclusions of the study are aimed at improving legislation and law enforcement practice in the field of ensuring and protecting non-essential human rights, including the right to physical existence. The results of the work can be used not only in law enforcement activities, but also in the process of teaching constitutional law.
About the Author
N. S. Pevtsova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia S. Pevtsova – post-graduate student, Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law
119991, Moscow, Leninskie gorki 1
References
1. Albitskaya I., Kosyakov A. [Artificial intelligence for lawyers]. In: Yuridicheskiy spravochnik rukovoditelya [Legal directory of the head], 2022, no. 1, pp. 79–84.
2. Andreev V. K. [Dynamics of the legal application of artificial intelligence regulation]. In: Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava [Journal of Russian law], 2020, no. 3, pp. 58–68.
3. Blazheev V. V., Egorova M. A., Barabashev A. G. et al. Pravovoye regulirovaniye iskusstvennogo intellekta v usloviyakh pandemii i infodemii [Legal regulation of artificial intelligence in a pandemic and infodemic]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2020. 236 p.
4. Ibragimov R. S., Suragina E. D., Churilova D. Yu. [Ethics and regulation of artificial intelligence]. In: Zakon [Law], 2021, no. 8, pp. 85–95.
5. Levushkin A. N., Tyulin A. V. [Deepfake and the system of artificial intelligence in the paradigm of the development of free rights]. In: Yurist [Lawyer], 2021, no. 11, pp. 19–24.
6. Malko A. V., Kostenko M. A. [Digital technologies in the judicial system: problems of implementation]. In: Rossiyskaya yustitsiya [Russian Justice], 2019, no. 2, pp. 52–54.
7. Nechkin A. V. Constitutional and legal status of artificial intelligence in Russia: present and future]. In: Lex Russica (Russkiy zakon ) [Lex Russica (Russian law)], 2020, vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 78–85.
8. Pevtsova E. A. [The impact of artificial intelligence on human legal activity]. In: Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava [Journal of Russian law], 2020, no. 9, pp. 19–31.
9. Stepanyan A. S. [Prospects for the use of artificial intelligence in family legal relations: problems of theory and practice]. In: Semeynoye i zhilishchnoye pravo [Family and housing law], 2021, no. 3, pp. 26–29.
10. Tsvetkov Yu. A. [Artificial intelligence in justice]. In: Zakon [Law], 2021, no. 4, pp. 91–107.
11. Chernogor N. N. [Artificial intelligence and its role in the transformation of the modern legal order]. In: Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava [Journal of Russian law], 2022, no. 4, pp. 5–15.
12. Aletras N., Tsarapatsanis D., Preoţiuc-Pietro D., Lampos V. Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective. In: PeerJ Computer Science, 2016, no. 10. DOI:10.7717/cs.93
Review
Views:
277
Email this article 