Diagnostic Research of Handwriting of Persons in an Unusual Psychophysiological State – Physical Fatigue
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6794-2023-1-125-131
Abstract
Aim. Analysis of the diagnostic picture of handwriting when the performer is exposed to a «confusing» factor – physical fatigue.
Methodology. The experimental material was collected, the basis for which was handwriting samples of 56 people who made an experimental text containing all the letters of the Russian alphabet, as well as a large number of the most common letter combinations in their normal state and when in the state of fatigue. The research of diagnostic features of handwriting was carried out according to the traditional method of forensic handwriting examination of handwriting and signatures.
Results. A complex of traits most susceptible to changes has been identified; besides, the most pronounced effect on highly developed handwritings is noted.
Research implications. The established set of features can contribute to the development of forensic tactics in terms of handwriting sampling, as well as further research on the studied «confusing» factor in the framework of diagnostic handwriting.
About the Author
G. Cherepenko
State University of Education; Non-profit organization «Center for Forensic Examinations and Research»
Georgie V. Cherepenko, Cand Sci . (Law), Senior Lecturer, Leading forensic expert
Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics
141014
ul. Very Voloshinoi 24
Moscow region
Mytishchi
References
1. Bobovkin M. V., Ruchkin V. A. [Forensic handwriting expertise in law enforcement in the Russian Federation]. In: Legal Concept, 2018, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 113–120.
2. Bondarenko R. V., Mozgovaya D. A. [Judicial examinations in cases of forgery of documents]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 2022, no. 1, pp. 51–54.
3. Bobovkin M. V., Grishin P. L., Protkin A. A., eds. Kriminalistika. Issledovaniye dokumentov [Criminalistics. Research of documents]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2017. 226 p.
4. Novakova K. A. [Problems of applying the method of differentiation of manuscripts into male and female in the study of modern handwriting]. In: Vestnik Belgorodskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii imeni I. D. Putilina [Bulletin of Belgorod Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after I. D. Putilin], 2022, no. 2, pp. 59–65.
5. Smirnov A. V., Yakovleva E. V. [Methods for establishing the fact of making brief notes in a deliberately changed handwriting in a cursive way]. In: Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy [Theory and Practice of Forensic Science], 2007, no. 4 (8), pp. 129–142.
6. Orlova V. F., ed. Sudebno-pocherkovedcheskaya ekspertiza: obshchaya chast [Forensic handwriting expertise: general part]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2006. 544 p.
7. Orlova V. F., ed. Sudebno-pocherkovedcheskaya ekspertiza: osobennaya chast: issledovaniye rukopisnykh tekstov [Forensic handwriting expertise: a special part: a study of handwritten texts]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2007. 341 p.
8. Tomilin V. V. Osnovy sudebno-meditsinskoy ekspertizy pisma [Fundamentals of forensic medical examination of the letter]. Moscow, Medicina Publ., 1974. 255 p.
Review
Views:
185
Email this article 