On the Issue of Establishing the Location of Persons Subject to Extradition and Hiding in Remote and Hard-to-Reach Areas
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-513X-2023-3-73-82
Abstract
Aim. On the basis of disparate norms of law, various doctrinal approaches and judicial practice, determine the possibility of classifying animals as sources of increased danger.
Methodology. Based on the methods of systematic analysis and comparison of disparate norms of private and public law, various doctrinal approaches and judicial practice, the possibility of classifying animals as a source of increased danger has been determined.
Results. It is justified as necessary and sufficient for qualification as a source of increased danger the application of characteristics of harmfulness and human controllability.
Research implications. It is recommended to include animals in the approximate list of sources of increased danger in Article 1079 of the Civil Code, to ensure a balance between compliance with the instructions of the law and their specification by the law enforcer.
About the Authors
V. V. Dolinskaya
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimira V. Dolinskaya – Dr. Sci. (Law), Prof., Civil Law Department, Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), Member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya 9, Moscow 125993
T. V. Letuta
Orenburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana V. Letuta – Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof., Departmentally Head, Department of Administrative and Financial Law
pr. Pobedi 13, Orenburg 460018
References
1. Anisimov A. P., Kayushnikova Yu. [Compensation for harm caused to the life, health and property of citizens by wild animals: questions of theory and practice]. In: Agrarnoye i zemel’noye pravo [Agrarian and Land Law], 2017, no. 8, pp. 58–65.
2. Antimonov B. S. Grazhdanskaya otvetstvennost za vred, prichinennyy ser’yeznoy opasnostyu [Civil liability for harm caused by a source of increased danger]. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 1952. 296 p.
3. Belyakova A. M. [Compensation for harm caused by a source of increased danger]. Moscow, Izd-vo Moskovskogo un-ta Publ., 1967. 56 p.
4. Bobrov D. V. [Concepts and problems of classification of animals as objects of property rights]. In: Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik [Siberian Legal Bulletin], 2022, no. 1, pp. 43–49.
5. Guseva E. A. Preduprezhdeniye prichineniya vreda vsledstviye deyatelnosti, predstavlyayushchey povyshennuyu opasnost dlya okruzhayushchikh, po grazhdanskomu pravu Rossii: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Prevention of harm due to activities that pose an increased danger to others, according to civil law of Russia: abstract of Cand. Sci. thesis in Legal sciences]. Mocow, 2014. 30 p.
6. Dolinskaya V. V., Morgunova E. A., Shevchenko O. M. Grazhdanskoye pravo: Obyekty prava [Civil law: Objects of rights]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2017. 123 p.
7. Dormidontov G. F. Sistema rimskogo prava. Veshchnoye pravo. Studencheskoye izdaniye [The system of Roman law. Property right. Student edition]. Kazan, Tipolitografiya Imperatorskogo universiteta Publ., 1913. 204 p.
8. Zakharov D. E. Zhivotnyye kak obyekty grazhdanskogo prava [Animals as objects of civil rights]. Ekaterinburg, Izd-vo Ural. un-ta Publ., 2020. 98 p. 9. Ioffe O. S. Obyazatelnoye pravo [Law of Obligations]. Leningrad, LGU Publ., 1975. 880 p.
9. Ioffe O. S. Izbrannyye trudy: pravootnosheniye po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu [Selected works: legal relations under Soviet civil law]. Leningrad, LGU Publ., 1955. 311 p.
10. Krasavchikov O. A. Vozmeshcheniye vreda, vyzvannogo povyshennoy opasnostyu [Compensation for harm caused by a source of increased danger]. Moscow, Yurid. lit. Publ., 1966. 200 p.
11. Letuta T. V., Mineev E. V., Shipilova O. V. [Harm caused by animals: problems of civil legal protection of victims]. In: Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Orenburg State University], 2014, no. 3, pp. 29–33.
12. Meyer D. I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Russian civil law]. Mocow, Statute Publ., 2003. 829 p.
13. Nazarova N. A., Zobova Yu. A. [Recognition of circus animals as a source of increased danger]. In: Yevraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal [Eurasian Legal Journal], 2021, no. 5, pp. 207–209.
14. Nevzgodina E. L., Lantukh D. V. [Source of increased danger and compensation for harm caused by animals that have an owner]. In: Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo [Bulletin of Omsk University. Series: Law], 2019, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 50–67.
15. Netishinskaya L. F., Akulshina K. G. [On the issue of the legal regime of animals as an object of civil rights]. In: Yuridicheskiy vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo sluzhashchego universiteta [Legal Bulletin of the Dagestan State University], 2021, no. 1, pp. 71–76.
16. Pushkina A. V. [Legal aspects of the inadmissibility of violence against animate things]. In: Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess [Arbitration and civil process], 2023, no. 3, pp. 47–53.
17. Rabetz A. P. [Features of the legal qualification of causing harm by wild and domestic animals]. In: Advances in law studies, 2016, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 409–417.
18. Tychinin S. V., Koroleva E. V. [Animals in the system of objects of civil rights]. In: Vestnik SanktPeterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 2020, no. 1, pp. 81–85.
19. Fleishitz E. A. Obyazatelstva iz prichineniya vreda i neobosnovannogo obogashcheniya [Obligations resulting from harm and unjust enrichment]. Moscow, Gos. izd-vo yur. lit. Publ., 1951. 239 p.
20. Chinchevich E. V. Vozmeshcheniye vreda, prichinonnogo zhizni i zdorov’yu zhivotnykh: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Compensation for harm caused to life and health by animals: abstract of Cand. Sci. thesis in Legal sciences]. Saratov, 2012. 22 p.
Review
Views:
223
Email this article 