The right to biosafety and the right to personal integrity in the health care system, providing the population with a safe environment
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-513X-2023-3-100-106
Abstract
Aim. To determine the meaningful relationships between the right to biological safety and the right to personal integrity, to identify current problems in the theory of legal understanding, and to assess the sources of law regulating relations in the field of biological safety.
Methodology. The work used general scientific and special research methods. These include comparative legal, dialectical, formal logical and formal legal.
Results. The content of the right to biological safety, its interrelation with the right to biological integrity is revealed. The principles of law that should be taken into account in the development of the legal content of biological safety are noted.
Research implications. The results of the study contribute to the theory of constitutional law, creating the prerequisites for the development of the doctrine of a new generation of rights in the health care system, providing the population with a safe environment.
Keywords
biological integrity,
biological safety,
health protection,
favorable environment,
biological factors,
biological risks
Supporting agencies: The research was carried out at the expense of a grant from the Russian Science Foundation no. 23-28-00113.
About the Author
N. E. Sapelchenko
Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia E. Sapelchenko – Senior Bibliographer, NBI Sector for Social Sciences, Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences
Nakhimovsky Prospekt 51/21, Moscow 117418
References
1. Aleshkova I. A. [The precautionary principle in the production and use of genetically modified organisms: legal regulation and strategizing in Russia]. In: Sotsial’nyye i gumanitarnyye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 4: Gosudarstvo i pravo [Social and Humanitarian Sciences. Domestic and foreign literature. Series 4: State and law], 2022, no. 4, pp. 59–70.
2. Bondar N. S. Prava cheloveka i Konstitutsiya Rossii: trudnyy put’ k svobode [Human rights and the Constitution of Russia: a difficult path to freedom]. Rostov on Don, Rost. un-ta Publ., 1996. 239 p.
3. Zhavoronkova N. G., Agafonov V. B. [Environmental, biological, social safety: organizational and legal aspect]. In: Lex Russica, 2020, no. 7, pp. 43–49.
4. Mokhov A. A. [Biolaw and the strategy of its development in the Russian Federation]. In: Aktualnyye problemy rossiyskogo prava [Current problems of Russian law], 2022, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 201–210.
5. Opaleva A. A. [The right to personal integrity in the context of the use of digital technologies]. In: Vestnik Universiteta prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Bulletin of the University of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation], 2021, no. 1, pp. 36–40.
6. Pevtsova N. S. [Physical aspects of human existence in domestic constitutional construction]. In: Konstitutsionnoye i munitsipalnoye pravo [Constitutional and municipal law], 2021, no. 12, pp. 51–57.
7. Umnova-Konyukhova I. A. [Biological safety in international law and Russian law as a new sphere of legal regulation]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Yurisprudentsiya [Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Jurisprudence], 2023, no. 2. pp. 7–19.
8. Umnova-Konyukhova I. A. [The right to be human - a fundamental right and constitutional narrative in the system of personal rights and freedoms in the paradigm of humanism]. In: Konstitutsionnoye i munitsipal’noye pravo [Constitutional and municipal law], 2021, no. 11, pp. 41–46.
9. Umnova-Konyukhova I. A., Aleshkova I. A. [The influence of scientific and technological progress in biotechnology on human rights and principles of law]. In: Aktualnyye problemy rossiyskogo prava [Current problems of Russian law], 2022, no. 10, pp. 34–45.
10. Ashcroft R. E. Could Human Rights Supersede Bioethics? In: Human Rights Law Review, 2010, no. 10, pp. 639–660.
Review
Views:
102
Email this article 