Judicial Penalty vs Astrent
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-513X-2023-4-67-74
Abstract
Aim. The purpose of the article is to identify the differences between the classic astrent model and the institute of judicial penalty introduced in Russia.
Methodology. The key features of the court penalty and astrent are analyzed, the peculiarities of law enforcement activity in the use of astrent in France are revealed, the main types of classical astrent, the grounds for application, and the subject composition are investigated. The possibility of cancellation of the court penalty by agreement of the parties (in Russia) is being investigated. The value of the classic astrent model as a sanction for contempt of court, contributing to the strengthening of the inevitability of the execution of judicial acts of a civil nature, is argued.
Results. According to the results of the study, it was concluded that the unambiguous equating of the court penalty with the classic astrent and the use of the phrase “astrent” in the Russian legal system is incorrect.
Research implications. The problems of understanding the content of the court penalty as a limited copy of the classic astrant have been updated.
About the Author
E. N. Kuznetsov
Ural State Law University named after V. F. Yakovlev
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeny N. Kuznetsov – Dr . Sci . (Law), Prof ., Department of Civil Procedure, Ural State Law University named after V . F . Yakovlev
ul. Komsomolskaya 21, Yekaterinburg 620137
References
1. . Bulanova D . S ., Kravtsov R . V . [Legal nature of the astrent] . In: Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: perspektivy razvitiya i prirody [Innovative economics: prospects for development and improvement], 2017, no . 2, pp . 28–32 .
2. . Varchuk A . A ., Pashkova D . A . [L’astreinte & astrent: comparative legal aspect] . In: Uralskiy zhurnal pravovykh issledovaniy [Ural Journal of Legal Research], 2021, no . 2, pp . 22–30 .
3. . Koltsova L . N . [Judicial penalty (astrent) as a measure of the debtor’s responsibility for failure to fulfill a court decision] . In: Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Pravo. Upravleniye [Bulletin of Pskov State University . Series: Economics . Right . Control], 2018, no . 7, pp . 103–107 .
4. . Kuznetsov E . N . [Astreinte as a method of coercing a debtor in enforcement proceedings in France] . In: Rossiyskiy yezhegodnik arbitrazhnogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessa [Russian Yearbook of Civil and Arbitration Process], 2003, no . 2, pp . 430–446 .
5. . Lobysheva E . A . [Astrent in Russian and foreign law] . In: Yuridicheskiy vestnik molodykh uchonykh [Legal Bulletin of Young Scientists], 2016, no . 3, pp . 34–38 .
6. . Protasova D . S . [Judicial penalty: formation, concept and its legal nature] . In: Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i gumanitarnykh nauk [International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences], 2021, no . 11-4, pp . 98–102 .
7. . Yarkov V . V . [Astrent in Russian law . Expert comments] . In: Zakon [Law], 2014, no . 4, pp . 34–47 .
8. . Labbay A . L’astreinte, un nouveau mode de financement au service de l’environnement? In: Pandémies et épidémies, 2021, no 19, pp . 137–145 .
9. . Leval G . De, Compernolle J . V . L’astreinte . Larcier, 2023 . 102 p .
10. . Payan G . Point de départ d’une astreinte: incidence de la régularité de la signification de la décision. Dalloz Actualité, 2022 . 20 p .
Review
Views:
70
Email this article 