Preview

Moscow Juridical Journal

Advanced search

Use of an Electronic Digital Signature to Optimize the Work of Forensic Examiners

https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-513X-2025-2-69-77

Abstract

Aim. To analyze the current legislation of the Russian Federation and organizational forms of forensic examination in terms of the possibility of using an electronic digital signature to sign an expert report.

Methodology. The current provisions of federal and intradepartmental regulatory and legal sources governing forensic activities in the Russian Federation are analyzed. A systematic method was used to analyze the possibility of using an electronic digital signature to sign an expert report in the context of current legal realities.

Results. The study found that there are no restraining factors now that could limit forensic experts in using an electronic digital signature for the procedurally correct execution of an expert report. Significant advantages have been identified for this form of signing the report which are associated with a reduction in the time required to produce expert assessments, an increase in the mobility of interregional interaction between judicial, investigative and expert bodies and a reduction in transport, postal and logistics costs which are borne by the parties and the federal budget when appointing examinations, reducing the likelihood of damage to fragile and dilapidated objects of forensic examination.

Research implications. The results of the research contribute to the practice of forensic examination, develop the possibilities of digital document management in the system of judicial and investigative authorities and forensic institutions, and promote further digitalization of forensic activities in the Russian Federation.

About the Author

G. V. Cherepenko
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation

Georgie V. Cherepenko – Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof., Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics; Leading forensic expert, Center for Forensic Examinations and Research

Moscow



References

1. Bagrova, D. A. (2022). Electronic Media Text as an Object of Forensic Linguistic Examination. In: Social and Humanitarian Problems of Education and Professional Self-Realization (Social Engineer-2022). Pt 8. Moscow: A. N. Kosygin State University of Russia publ., pp. 223–227 (in Russ.).

2. Dudchenko, A. V., Khandus, I. O. & Derkach, A. A. (2025). Principles of Regulating Expert Activity in the Russian Federation. In: Agrarian and Land Law, 4, 437–439 (in Russ.).

3. Efimov, A. A., Kolokolov, G. R. & Savenkova, E. N. (2025). The Role and Possibilities of Forensic Medical Expert Studies Based on Materials of Civil Cases Related to Compensation for Moral Damage. In: Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin, 1, 172–181. DOI: 10.24412/2227-7315-2025-1-172-181 (in Russ.).

4. Korepina, E. A. & Dugarskaya, T. A. (2025). On the Implementation of Modern Digital Technologies in the Activities of the Russian Notary Public. In: Law and Justice, 2, 161–165. DOI: 10.24412/2073-3313-2025-2-161-165 (in Russ.).

5. Krepyshev, A. M. & Yulberdina, L. R. (2023). Legal Status of Electronic Documents as a Means of Evidence. In: Law and State: The Theory and Practice, 8, 274–276. DOI: 10.47643/1815-1337_2023_8_274 (in Russ.).

6. Novikova, V. D. (2025). Problems of Assessing an Expert’s Opinion by the Court. In: Issues of Russian Justice, 36, 545–551 (in Russ.).

7. Ramaldanov, H. H. (2022). Concept and Essence of Digitalization of Evidence and Proof in Criminal Proceedings. In: Bulletin of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 1, 121–128. DOI: 10.25724/VAMVD.ZDEF (in Russ.).

8. Rossinskaya, E. R. (2022). Concept of a Special Theory of Digitalization of Forensic Activity. In: Bulletin of Economic Security, 5, 173–178. DOI: 10.24412/2414-3995-2022-5-173-178 (in Russ.).

9. Rossinskaya, E. R. (2020). The doctrine of digitalization of forensic activity and problems of forensic didactics. In: Rule of Law: Theory and Practice, 4-1, 88–101. DOI: 10.33184/pravgos-2020.4.9 (in Russ.).

10. Cherepenko, G. V. (2018). On the Possibility of Expanding the Concept “Copy” in Forensic Handwriting Examination. In: Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University, 7, 212–221. DOI: 10.17803/2311-5998.2018.47.7.212-221 (in Russ.).

11. Shurukhnova, D. N. (2023). Main Directions for the Implementation of Electronic Proceedings in Cases of Administrative Offenses in the Russian Federation. In: Bulletin of Economic Security, 5, 180–183. DOI: 10.24412/2414-3995-2023-5-180-183 (in Russ.).


Review

Views: 143

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5091 (Print)
ISSN 2949-513X (Online)