History of Political and Legal Doctrines: Features of the Subject and Research Methodology
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-513X-2025-4-6-13
Abstract
Aim. To identify specific features of the subject and methodology of the history of political and legal doctrines as legal science and an academic discipline of the theoretical and historical cycle.
Methodology. The article uses the method of analyzing the subject of the history of political and legal doctrines (its structural components) and approaches the study of political and legal doctrines and ideologies, as well as the method of their comparative study.
Results. The article presents the author’s vision of the subject of the history of political and legal doctrines, as well as a description of the features of fundamental approaches to the study of political and legal doctrines and ideologies that constitute the methodology of this legal science.
Research implications. It is concluded that it is impossible to recreate a complete picture of the development of political and legal thought in Russia and foreign countries without the integrated use of materialistic, idealistic, metaphysical, dialectical, historical (concrete-historical) and relativistic approaches to the study of political and legal doctrines and ideologies that constitute the subject of the history of political and legal teachings.
About the Authors
N. I. Nazarenko
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalya I. Nazarenko – Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof., Department of Constitutional and Civil Law
Moscow
B. A. Nazarenko
Moscow International University; Academy of Labor and Social Relations
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Bogdan A. Nazarenko – Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof., Department of Jurisprudence; History of State and Law
Moscow
References
1. Cherdantsev, A. F. (2001). Theory of State and Law: Textbook for Higher Education Institutions. Moscow: Yurayt-M publ. (in Russ.).
2. Bichekhvost, A. F. (2016). Political Ideas in Early Christianity. In: Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin, 5, 206–210 (in Russ.).
3. Edronova, V. N. & Ovcharov, A. O. (2013). Methods, Methodology, and Logic of Scientific Research. In: Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 9, 14–23 (in Russ.).
4. Lazarev, V. V., ed. (2008). History of Political and Legal Thought. Moscow: Vyssheye obrazovaniye publ. (in Russ.).
5. Dyachkova, N. N. & Dolya, V. E. (2003). History of Political and Legal Thought. Moscow: Academic Project publ. (in Russ.).
6. Kokhanovsky, V. P., Przhilensky, V. I. & Sergodeyeva, E. A. (2006). Philosophy of Science. Rostov-on-Don: MarT publ. (in Russ.).
7. Radko, T. N., Lazarev, V. V. & Morozova, L. A. (2014). Theory of State and Law. Moscow: Prospekt publ. (in Russ.).
8. Kornev, A. V. (2022). Methodological Foundations of Studying the History of Political and Legal Doctrines. In: Lex Russica, 5, 127–136. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2022.186.5.127-136 (in Russ.).
9. Kornev, A. V. (2023). Basic Methods of the History of Political and Legal Doctrines and the Possible Transformation of the Object of Legal Science. In: Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 4, 26–40. DOI: 10.17803/2311-5998.2023.104.4.026-040 (in Russ.).
10. Daineko, I. V. & Mukhin, M. A. (2020). The Term “Ideology” and Its Use: History and Modernity. In: Bulletin of Science and Creativity, 9, 5–11 (in Russ.).
11. Romashov, R. A. (2015). Legal Doctrines and Doctrinal Legal Acts. In: Legal Science: History and Modernity, 10, 19–24 (in Russ.).
Review
Views:
88
JATS XML
Email this article 