Modern Methods of Trace Evidence Research

Aim. To conduct comprehensive analysis of the theoretical and methodological foundations and experimental validation of modern methods of trace evidence methodology that ensure compliance with the requirements of scientific nature, objectivity and reliability imposed by the legislation of the Russian Federation for forensic examinations.

Methodology. The scientific literature was analyzed, the theoretical foundations of trace evidence methodology, as well as modern approaches to such research were studied, the works of both domestic and foreign authors specializing in the use of trace evidence methods in forensics were analyzed. Real cases of using various research methods in judicial practice are considered.

Results. It was confirmed in the study that the term “trace” needs to be clarified in forensic science, the Quantitative Trace Evidence Methodology Assessment Model was substantiated.

Research implications. The results of the study expand the understanding of the capabilities of modern technologies in the field of ballistic expertise. The developed approaches can be used to improve curricula in the field of forensic science, as well as to develop new methodologies for the study of trace evidence processes. The proposed methods can be directly implemented in the work of investigative bodies and expert institutions.

1. Biktimirova, Yu. V. (2021). Prospects for the Use of 3D Modeling Technologies in Forensic Research. In: Current Issues of the Security Systems and Protected Telecommunication Systems Operation. Voronezh, pp. 229–231 (in Russ.)

2. Vladimirov, V. Yu. & Danilov, I. A. (2024). Ensuring the Reliability of the Results of Forensic Examination in the Context of Its Virtualization. In: Proceedings of Management Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia, 2, 82–90. DOI: 10.24412/2072-9391-2024-270-82-90 (in Russ.)

3. Polyakova, A. V. (2024). Creation and Development of 3D-Technologies in Forensic Activities: Methodological and Organizational Aspects: [dissertation]. Ufa (in Russ.)

4. Holevchuk, A. G. (2021). Main Trends and Prospects for the Development of Fingerprinting in the USA. Moscow: Prospect publ. (in Russ.)

5. Pisarev, S. A., Chirkov, D. V. & Fedorova, E. A. (2020). Analysis of Aberrations and Methods of Minimizing Their Influence on the Results of Rapid-Flowing Dynamic Processes Research Using a High-Speed Video Camera. In: Vestnik IzhGTU imeni M. T. Kalashnikova, 23-4, 6–15. DOI: 10.22213/2413-1172-2020-4-6-15 (in Russ.)

6. Filippov, M. N. (2023). Past, Present and Future of Forensic Scientific Research. In: The Union of Criminalists and Criminologists, 3, 39–51 (in Russ.).

7. Westerlund, M., Isabelle, D. A. & Leminen, S. (2021). The Acceptance of Digital Surveillance in an Age of Big Data. In: Technology Innovation Management Review, 11-3, 32–44.

8. Ziganshin, M. N. (2023). Prospects for the Development of Technical and Forensic Means and Methods in Classical Trace Evidence Methodology In: State Scientific and Technical Policy in the Field of Forensic Support of Law Enforcement. Moscow, 225–230 (in Russ.)

9. Yumshanova, V. A. & Vozzhennikova, O. S. (2023). Actual Problems of Forensic Trace Evidence Methodology. In: My Professional Career, 1 (55), 44–50 (in Russ.)

10. Ristenbatt, M. P., Hietpas, J. & Fores, P. R De. (2022). Trace Evidence Methodology and Its Role in Modern Forensic Science. In: Journal of Forensic Sciences, 67-3, 28–32. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14860

11. Nesmiyanova, I. O. (2020). 3D-Scanning in Expert Activity: Concept, Essence and Possibilities of Application. In: Systems and Management, 2 (2), 50–67. DOI: 10.47351/2658-7874_2020_2_2_50 (in Russ.).