International and European law: the general and special
Abstract
The article is devoted to the research of
the most important questions, as concerning the common
traits of international and European law. In relations
of these law systems the author has marked the
advantage of international law over the European law.
The advantage of international law over the European
law like a particular relation has displayed in different
levels and forms. The author also has marked that except
common sources of law every law system employs
its own sources of law.
the most important questions, as concerning the common
traits of international and European law. In relations
of these law systems the author has marked the
advantage of international law over the European law.
The advantage of international law over the European
law like a particular relation has displayed in different
levels and forms. The author also has marked that except
common sources of law every law system employs
its own sources of law.
References
1. Договор о Европейском Союзе от 7 февраля 1992 г. Ст. 24. П. 5 // Горниг Г., Витвицкая О. Право Европейского союза. М., 2005. 250 c.
2. Договор, учреждающий Европейское сообщес- тво. Ст. 17-21 // Европейское право / рук. авт. колл. и отв. ред. Л.М. Энтин. М., 2004. 570 с.
3. Европейский союз. Основополагающие акты в редакции Лиссабонского договора с коммента- риями / отв. ред. С.Ю. Кашкин. М., 2008. 200 с.
4. Международное публичное право / отв. ред.К.А. Бекяшев. М., 2004. 500 с.
5. Международное право / под ред. Г.И. Тункина. М., 1994. 500 с.
6. Топорнин Б.Н. Европейское право. М., 1998. 420 с.
7. Юридическая энциклопедия / под общ. ред.Б.Н. Топорнина. М., 2001. 675 с.
8. Amendments to the Treaty of European Union and to the Treaty Establishing the European Community. Article 7a // Official Journal of the European Union. 2005. p. 30-35.
9. Brierly J. The Law of Nations. L., 1963. 120 p.
10. Boyle A. and Chinkin Ch. The Making of International Law. Oxford, 2007. 250 p.
11. Bogdandy A. Constitutionalism in International Law: Comment One Proposal from Germany // Harvard International Law Journal. Vol. 47. № 1. P. 224-233.
12. Bederman D. The Spirit of international Law. L., 2002. 370 p.
13. Conforti B. International Law and the Role of Domestic Legal Systems. Boston, 1993. 233 p.
14. Case 87/75 Bresciani v. Amministrazioni Italiana delle Finanze (1976). ECR 449.
15. Case 104/81 Hauptzollamt Mainz v. Kupferberg (1982). ECR 3641.
16. Case C-207/91 Eurimpharm v. Bundesgesundheitsamt (1993). ECR 1-3723.
17. Case 244/80 Foglia v. Novello (1981). ECR 3045- 3064.
18. Case 261/81 Walter Rau Lebensmittelwerkev. De Smedt Pyba (1982). ECR 3961.
19. Crawford J. The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford, 2006. 520 p.
20. Conforti B. International Law and the Role of Domestic Legal Systems. Boston, 1993. 233p.
21. Сase 12/86 Demirel v. Stadt Schwabisch Gmund (1987). RCR 3719.
22. Case C-192/89 Sevince (1990). ECR I-3461.
23. Case C-61/94 Commission v. Germany (1996). ECRI-3989.
24. D'Arcy L., Murray C., Cleave B. The Law and Practice of International Trade. L.,2000. 450 p.
25. Eeckhout P. External Relations of the European Union. Legal and Constitutional Foundations. Oxford, 2004. 278 p.
26. Elias O. General International Law in the European Court of Justice: from Hypothesis to Reality? // Netherlands Jean Book of International Law. 2000. Vol. XXXI. 318 p.
27. Fazio S. Harmonization of International Commercial Law. N. Y., 2007. P. 8-16.
28. Fisch J. Power or Weakness? On the Causes of the Worldwide Expansion of European international Law // Journal of the History of International Law. 2004. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 23-25.
29. Govaere I., Capeau J. and Vermeersch. In-Between Seats: The Participation of the European Union in International Organizations // European Foreign Affairs Review. 2004. № 9. p. 155-184.
30. Ginsberg R. European Union in International Politics. Oxford, 2001. P. 268.
31. Jacobs Fr., Roberts Sh. (eds.). The Effect of Treaties in Domestic Law. L., 1987. Vol. 7. P. XXIV-XXXI.
32. Jackson J. The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO. Cambridge, 2000. 427p.
33. Kapteyn P. and Themaat P. Introduction to the Law of European Communities. From Maastricht to Amsterdam. Boston, 1998. 1264 p.
34. Kronenberger V. (ed.). The European Union and the International Legal Order: Discord or Harmony? The Haag, 2001. 550 p.
35. Lowe V. International Law. Oxford, 2007. 378 p.
36. Lavranos N. Legal Interaction Between Decision of International Organizations and European Law. L., 2004. 227 p.
37. Lavranos N. Relations of the European Union. Legal and Constitutional Foundations. Oxford, 2004. 236 p.
38. Neuwahl N. Legal Personality of the European Union. International and Institutional Aspects //
39. Kronenberger V. (ed.). The European Union and the International Legal Order: Discord or Harmony? The Haque, 2001. P. 10-11. 39. Opinion 1/76 (1977) ECR 741 at 755.
40. Paasivirva E. and Kuyper P. Does One Size Fit All? The European Community and the Responsibility of International Organizations // Netherlands Yearbook of InternationalLaw. 2005. Vol. XXXVI. P. 134-140.
41. Shelton D. (ed.). Commitment and Compliance. The Rise of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System. Oxford, 2000. P. 5-6 .
42. Steffenson R. Managing EU-US Relation. Actors, Institutions and the New Transatlantic Agenda. N. Y., 2005. P. 134.
43. Slavghter A., Burke-White W. The Future of International Law is Domestic (or, The European Way of Law) // Harvard International Law Journal. 2006. Vol. 47. № 2. Р. 352.
44. Witte B. Treaty Revision in the European Union: Constitutional Change Through International Law // Netherlands Yearbook of International Law. 2004. Vol. XXXI. 318 p.
Review
Views:
130
Email this article 