Preview

Moscow Juridical Journal

Advanced search

THE PRINCIPLE OF GOOD FAITH IN DEALING WITH LEGAL SOURCES (THEORETICAL AND LEGAL STUDY BASED ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE ARBITRATION PRACTICE)

https://doi.org/ 10.18384/2310-6794-2019-1-51-63

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the meaning of the principle of good faith in international law practices. The author uses the method of comparative studies, which allows us to prove that in court procedures of different countries there is a system of requirements for the autonomous interpretation of international law sources. However, the sources of law cannot be applied without reliance on the concepts of national legal systems. The novelty of the study is to identify trends in legal practice, according to which the need to implement the principle of good faith to promote the rules of Autonomous Commercial Law («lex mercatoria») is obvious. The author reveals the essence of the implementation of the principle of good faith in the application of different sources of law, revealing the homeward trend, i.e. denial of the autonomous approach to the interpretation of international law sources and neglect of their international attributes. The study is both theoretical and practical and allows the law enforcement officer to see that the exact application of law and legal technique can lead to unfair decisions, violation of justice, turning certain relationships into the so-called severe cases (hard cases). The main conclusions of the author are that the adoption of an arbitral award on the basis of good faith and honesty does not mean that it is based only on a sense of law or on a fair assessment. It should be based on the circumstances of the case. Consequently, contemporary law, whether at the national, regional or international level, provides for appropriate remedial mechanisms in the form of the application of the principles of good faith, fairness, best practices and other standards.

About the Author

Dr. A. Сhirić
Belgrade State University, Republic of Serbia
Russian Federation


References

1. Нам К. В. Принцип добросовестности. Отдельные аспекты. Вещное право // Zakon.ru [сайт]. URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2018/10/7/princip_dobrosovestnosti_otdelnye_aspekty_veschnoe_pravo (дата обращения: 03.03.2019).

2. Кузьмин И. А. Объективные и субъективные предпосылки толкования права // Сибирский юридический вестник. 2017. № 3. С. 8-12.

3. Певцова Е. А., Клишина А. В. О некоторых аспектах правосознания адвокатов: историко-правовое исследование // Право и образование. 2014. № 2. С. 144-156.

4. Певцова Е. А., Соколов Н. Я. Профессиональное поведение юристов в электронном государстве в случаях несовершенства законодательства // Журнал Российского права. 2018. № 6 (258). С. 40-49.

5. Васиљевић М. Трговинско право. Београд, 2012. 583 p.

6. Вулетић В. Од bona fides до начела савесности и поштења // Анали Правног факултета у Београду 2010. № 1. P. 258-187.

7. Ferdinand U. Obyčajové právo mešťanov do 13. Storočia // Historicky Casopis. 2018. Vol. 66. Iss. 2. P. 219-239.

8. Handrlica J. «Atomic Law» or «Nuclear Law»? An Academic Discussion Revisited // BRICS Law Journal. 2018. Vol. V. Iss. 3. P. 135-151.

9. Harrington K. J., Nutting C. M. Bravo for PRAVO // The Lancet Oncology. 2010. № 11 (5). P. 407-408.

10. Kutleљa M. Dialogue between bioethics and biopolitics: The right to life of elderly people // Diacovensia: teoloљki prilozi. 2018. Iss. 26. № 3. P. 437-456.

11. Љkrk M. Ozn in pravo morja // Teorija in Praksa. 2016. Iss. 53 (1). P. 86-102.

12. Стојановић Д. Савесност и поштење у промету. Савремена администрација. Београд, 1973. 139 p.

13. Vukorepa I. Migracije i pravo na rad u Europskoj Uniji // Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu. 2018. № 68 (1). P. 85-120.

14. Цветковић П. Н. Тумачење уговора о међународној продаји робе: улога принципа добре вере и проблем «међународне» интерпретације // Право и привреда. 2001. P. 966-979.

15. Ћирић А. Међународно трговинско право. Општи део. Ниш, 2010. 554 p.

16. Ћирић А. Међународно трговинско право. Посебни део. Ниш, 2012. 536 р.

17. Bridge M. Uniformity and Diversity in the Law of International Sale. The CISG and Uniform Law // Pace International Law Review. 2003. Vol. 15. Iss. 1. P. 72-88.

18. Cerny P. The Changing Architecture of Politics: Structure, Agency and the Future of the State. London: Sage Publications, 1990. p. XVIII, 267.

19. Cox R. Critical Political Economy // International Political Economy. Understanding Global Disorder. London & New Jersey: Zed Books, 1995. P. 31-45.

20. Cutler C. Public Meets Private: The International Unification and Harmonisation of Private International Trade Law // Global Society. 1999. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 25-48.

21. Ferrari F. Tribunale di Vigevano: Specific Aspects of the CISG Uniformly Dealt With [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/ferrari6.html (дата обращения: 12.12.2018).

22. Honnold J. Uniform Law for International Sales under the 1980 United Nations Convention [Электронный ресурс] URL: http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/honnold.html (дата обращения: 03.03.2019).

23. Huber P., Mullis A. The CISG. A New Textbook for Students and Practitioners [Электронный ресурс]. URL http://bookre.org/reader?file=1162203&pg=4 (дата обращения: 03.03.2019).

24. Keily Т. Good Faith and the Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) [Электронный ресурс] URL:https://www.trans-lex.org/131400/_/keily-troy-good- (дата обращения: 12.12.2018).

25. Klein J. Good Faith in International Transactions // Liverpool Law Review. 1993. No. 15. P. 125-134.

26. Koneru P. The International Interpretation of the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: An Approach Based on General Principles // Minnesota Journal of Global Trade. 1997. No. 6. P. 105-152.

27. Lookofsky J. The 1980 United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods [Электронный ресурс] URL: http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/lookofsky.html (дата обращения: 29.07.2018).

28. Ruggie J. Trade Protectionism and the Future of Welfare Capitalism // Jorunal of International Affairs. 1994. Vol. 48. No. 1. P. 1-11.


Review

Views: 134


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5091 (Print)
ISSN 2949-513X (Online)