Discussion of the Ruling Parties of the Weimar Republic on the Legal Problems in 1919–1921
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6794-2022-4-35-44
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the political and legal attitudes of prominent representatives of the ruling parties of Weimar Germany in their political and legislative activities.
Methodology. Content analysis was a key research method.
Results. The key points of view on topical issues of constitutional, criminal and international law are revealed.
Research implications. The study reveals the legal approaches of political public organizations to building a rule of law state.
About the Authors
P. V. Borbotko
Vitebsk State University named by P. Masherov
Belarus
Belarus
Pavel V. Borbotko – Cand. Sci . (Historical), Assoc . Prof, Department of Civil Law and Civil Process
Moscovskiy prospect 33, Vitebsk 210009
I. I. Shmatkov
Vitebsk State University named by P. Masherov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor I. Shmatkov – Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof, Department of Civil Law and Civil Process
Moscovskiy prospect 33, Vitebsk 210009
References
1. Artamoshin S. V. [Ernst Jungern’s controversy with National Socialism during the years of the Weimar Republic]. In: Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Bryansk State University], 2022, no. 2 (52), pp. 7–14.
2. Afanasiev S. [State-church law (Staatskirchenrecht): the response of German constitutionalism to the challenges of preserving the state and religion]. In: Sravnitelnoye konstitutsionnoye obozreniye [Comparative constitutional review], 2019, no. 3, pp. 69–84.
3. Borbotko P. V., Shmatkov I. I. [Sources on the parliamentary activities of the ruling parties of the Weimar Republic in 1919–1923]. In: Sovremennaya nauchnaya mysl [Modern scientific thought], 2020, no. 1, pp. 43–47.
4. Borbotko P. V. [Evolution of the ideological and legal doctrine of program documents of the SPD and NNP]. In: Pravo. Ekonomika. Psikhologiya [Law. Economy. Psychology], 2022, no. 2, pp. 3–12.
5. Wirth N. F. [The Weimar Republic in the dialectical theology of Friedrich Gogarten]. In: Gumanitarnyye i yuridicheskiye issledovaniya [Humanitarian and legal research], 2020, no. 2, pp. 23–27.
6. Wirth N. F. [The reaction of the Protestant clergy to the establishment of the Weimar Republic in Germany]. In: Gumanitarnyye i yuridicheskiye issledovaniya [Humanitarian and legal research], 2021, no. 2, pp. 29–34.
7. Denisov S. I. [Evolution of the emergency legislation of Germany from July 1919 to July 1920]. In: Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Bryansk State University], 2018, no. 2 (36), pp. 29–36.
8. Ivanchuk D. V., Moiseev A. V. [Features of the emergence and development of social legislation in Germany in 1880–1920]. In: Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i yestestvennykh nauk [International Journal of the Humanities and Natural Sciences], 2019, no. 10-2, pp. 108–113.
9. Isakov P. S. [The evolution of civil society institutions during the Weimar Republic and the Third Reich]. In: Grazhdanskoye obshchestvo v Rossii i za rubezhom [Civil society in Russia and abroad], 2017, no. 1, pp. 20–24.
10. Levchuk S. V. [The vices of constitutional liberalism in a crisis (based on the materials of the Weimar constitution of Germany in 1919)]. In: Istoriya gosudarstva i prava [History of State and Law], 2020, no. 9, pp. 58–63.
11. Naumova Yu. A. [Rapallo treaty of 1922 and the problem of building diplomatic relations between the RSFSR and Weimar Germany in the assessments of domestic and foreign historians]. In: Molodoy uchonyy [Young scientist], 2022, no. 42, pp. 205–211.
12. Nochvina B. A. [Influence of the ideas of the October Revolution in Russia on the formation of Weimar Germany and the foreign policy of the Weimar Republic]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Obshchestvennyye nauki [Bulletin of Moscow State Linguistic University. Social Sciences], 2019, no. 2, pp. 118–127.
13. Nochvina B. A., Starikova N. V. [Weimar democracy and left-wing internationalism: an identity crisis]. In: Prepodavatel XXI vek [Lecturer 21st century], 2020, no. 4-2, pp. 335–344.
14. Popov I. D. [Regional policy of Germany in the period of the Weimar Republic (1918–1933) in Soviet and post-soviet historiography]. In: Nauchnyy dialog [Scientific dialogue], 2019, no. 8, pp. 308–344.
15. Ruzlyaev M. Yu. The historical significance of the Weimar Constitution of 1919 for the development of the ideas of constitutionalism]. In: Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo [Science. Society. State], 2018, vol. 6, no. 2 (22), pp. 40–45.
16. Subbotin O. G. [The Weimar Republic: in search of a foreign policy identity]. In: Vestsí BDPU. Seryya 2. Gístoryya. Fílasofíya. Palítalogíya. Satsyyalogíya. Ekanomíka. Kultaralogíya [Proceedings of BDPU. Series 2. History. Philosophy. Politology. Sociology. Economics. Culturology], 2021, no. 2, pp. 6–14.
17. Subbotin O. G. [State and constitution in the theory of integration of Rudolf Smend]. In: Vestsí BDPU. Seryya 2. Gístoryya. Fílasofíya. Palítalogíya. Satsyyalogíya. Ekanomíka. Kultaralogíya [Proceedings of BDPU. Series 2. History. Philosophy. Politology. Sociology. Economics. Culturology], 2021, no. 4, pp. 5–13.
18. Subbotin O. G. [On the issue of the state-territorial structure of Weimar Germany]. In: Nauchnyye trudy Respublikanskogo instituta vysshey shkoly. Istoricheskiye i psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye nauki [Scientific works of the Republican Institute of Higher Education. Historical and psychological-pedagogical sciences], 2020, no. 20-2, pp. 214–221.
19. Turygin A. A. [Gutenberg vs. Erzberger: Criticism of the financial reform of the Reich Minister in the Weimar National Assembly]. In: Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Bryansk State University], 2021, no. 1 (47), pp. 128–140.
20. Schultz E. E. [The November Revolution of 1918 in Germany and the problems of the emergence, development and fall of the Weimar Republic]. In: Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Tomsk State University], 2018, no. 426, pp. 223–228.
Review
Views:
121
Email this article 