On Court Management Models: Retrospective and Comparative Aspects
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6794-2022-4-65-72
Abstract
Aim. Analysis of the Chinese model of court management.
Methodology. In the process of research, methods of analysis, comparative legal, systematic, formal legal, were used.
Results. Formerly the Chinese model has been characterized as a model of external management of courts. Based on the analysis of domestic and foreign directive and literary sources, the article shows the appearance of new elements of judicial self-government in the PRC over the past decade. It seems that changes in Chinese legislation and legal practice have led to a transformation in the type of judicial administration – at the present stage, the model of judicial administration in the PRC can be characterized as a model of separate administration of courts.
Research implications. Russian science, according to the fair opinion of modern Russian jurists, needs to carefully monitor the development of the legislative system of the PRC and conduct its large-scale comparative studies for the possible use of progressive Chinese experience in scientific and practical activities. Some recent publications emphasize the need for Russia to have a common vision of Eastern problems and discuss them at scientific conferences.
About the Author
S. H. Dzhioev
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Soslan H. Dzhioev – Dr. Sci. (Law), Prof., Department of Organization of Judicial and Prosecution and Investigation Activities
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya 9, Moscow 125933
References
1. Biryukov A. V. [Experience of China: lessons for Russia in the XXI century] In: Ekonomicheskiye strategii [Economic strategies], 2013, no. 5, pp. 6–15.
2. Bogaturov A. D [Russia was and remains a European country, which does not prevent it from turning more towards Asia]. In: Zakon [Law], 2022, no. 8, pp. 8–12.
3. Burdina E. V Pravovaya priroda, organizatsiya i deyatelnost organov sudeyskogo soobshchestva v sudebnoy sisteme Rossii: dis. dok. yurid. nauk [Legal nature, organization and activity of the bodies of the judicial community in the judicial system of Russia: Dr. Sci. thesis in Juridical Sciences]. Moscow, 2016. 537 p.
4. Burdina E. V [Typology of the bodies of the judicial community in the Russian Federation and foreign countries]. In: Rossiyskoye pravosudiye [Russian justice], 2014, no. 6, pp. 51–61.
5. Vinogradov A. V. [The final session of the NPC of the 13th convocation and some results of state construction for 10 years]. In: Problemy Dalnego Vostoka [Problems of the Far East], 2022, no. 4, pp. 7–21.
6. Voskresensky A. D. [Realization of the «Chinese dream» during the «epoch of Si Jinping»: what can Russia expect?] In: Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya [World economy and international relations], 2019, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 5–16.
7. Neshataeva T. N., ed. Modernizatsiya statusa sudi: sovremennyye mezhdunarodnyye podkhody [Modernization of the status of a judge: modern international approaches]. Moscow, Norma Publ., Infra-M Publ., 2011. 335 p.
8. Troshchinsky P. V. [Legislation]. In: Babaeva K. V., ed. Kitayskaya Narodnaya Respublika: politika, ekonomika, kultura. 2019–2021 [People’s Republic of China: politics, economics, culture. 2019–2021]. Moscow: Institut Dalnego Vostoka RAN Publ., 2022, pp. 18–38.
Review
Views:
193
Email this article 