The Conformity of Goods under the CISG
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6794-2022-4-94-106
Abstract
Aim. To analyse CISG Article 35 which regulates conformity of goods.
Methodology. The method of analysis, empirical research method were used
Results. In international sales law, the buyer is entitled to receive what was bargained between both parties and the seller has an obligation to send the goods in accordance with the contract of sale. Naturally, the goods must be suitable as agreed in the contract of sale. Therefore, the conformity of goods is the duty of the seller. Article 35 CISG is only provision which regulates the conformity of goods. Research iimplications. Conformity of goods is a very significant part of the contract of sale in international sales law and non-conformity of goods may amount to the fundamental breach of the contract of sale. Conformity of goods is shaped by the expectations of the buyer and is the duty of the seller. Pursuant to Article 35 CISG, conformity of goods is categorized in two different groups; the express conformity of goods and the implied conformity of goods. The express conformity of goods criteria are contractual quality, contractual quantity, contractual description and packaging in CISG Article 35(1). The implied conformity of goods criteria are fitness for the ordinary purpose, fitness for the particular purpose, sample goods and packaging in CISG Article 35(2). Packaging is the common criterion for both criteria.
About the Author
Ю. AY, Yunus EmreTurkey
Yunus Emre AY – LLM Degree, Lawyer
Soğuksu Mah. 300. sok. Aylar Apt. Kat:3 Daire:7 Muratpaşa, Antalya
References
1. Al-ajaj A. The Concept of Fundamental Breach and Avoidance under CISG: PhD Thesis. 2015, 202 p.
2. Andrushchenko S. Non-conformity of goods under Article 35 of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for International Sale of Goods. In: Knowledge Transfer in the Global Academic Environment. Vol. I. Lviv, 2020. P. 15–22.
3. Atamer Y. M. Uluslararası Satım Sözleşmelerine İlişkin Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması(CISG) Uyarınca Satıcının Yükümlülükleri ve Sözleşmeye Aykırılığın Sonuçları, 1. Bası, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul, 2005. 546 p.
4. Ay Y. E. The Fundamental Breach of Contract of Sale under the CISG. In: Facta Universitatis. Series: Law and Politics, 2022, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 25–32.
5. Can H., Tuna E. Sınıraşan Sözleşmelere İlişkin Meseleler Gümrükten Geçmeyen Mallardan Kaynaklanan Hukuki Sorumluluğa İlişkin Bir Vaka İncelemesi. In: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2019, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 2161–2194.
6. Carr I. International Trade Law. Routledge, 2009. 738 p.
7. Chen M. M., Pair L. M. Chapter 35: Avoidance for non-Conformity of Goods under Art. 49(1)(A) CISG. In: Liber Amicorum Eric Bergsten International Arbitration and Commercial Law: Synergy, Convergence and Evolution / ed. S. Kröll, L. A. Mistelis, P. Perales Viscasillas, V. Rogers. Kluwer Law International, 2011, pp. 655–664.
8. Dawwas A. Non-Confirmity of Goods in Light of CISG, Unidroit Principles and the Palestinian Commercial Law Draft. In: Journal of Sharia & Law, 2012, no. 52, pp. 25–108.
9. De Luca V. The Conformity of the Goods to the Contract in International Sales. In: Pace International Law Review, 2015, vol. 27, iss. 1, pp. 162–257.
10. Doğan H. Viyana Satım Sözleşmesi ve Türk Borçlar Kanunu Kapsamında Satıcının Ayıptan Doğan Sorumluluğu ve Özellikle Viyana Satım Sözleşmesine Göre Alıcının Tazminat Talep Etme Hakkı, Master Thesis. İstanbul, 2017. 148 p.
11. Ekşi N. Milletlerarası Ticaret Hukuku, Beta Yayıncılık, 1. Bası, Mart İstanbul 2010, 591 p.
12. Galego Dias A. C. The Concept of Lack of Conformity: From the CISG to the Proposal on Online Sale of Goods. Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2017, 103 p.
13. Gao X. The Fraud Rule in Law of Letters of Credit in the P.R.C. In: The International Lawyer, 2007, vol. 41, pp. 1067–1090.
14. Graffi L. Remarks on Trade Usages and Business Practices in International Sales Law. In: Journal of Law and Commerce, 2011, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 273–295.
15. Gillette C. P., Ferrari F. Warranties and «Lemons» under CISG Article 35(2)(a). In: Internationales Handesrecht (IHR), 2010, vol. 1, pp. 2–17.
16. Henschel R. F. Conformity of Goods in International Sales Governed by CISG Article 35: Caveat Venditor, Caveat Emptor and Contract Law As Background Law and As a Competing Set of Rules. In: Nordic Journal of Commercial Law, 2004, iss. 1, pp. 1–21.
17. Huber P., Mullis A. The CISG A New Textbook for Students and Practitioners. In: European Law Publishers, 2007. 408 p.
18. Kristensen K. Q. The Conformity Assessment for International Sale of Goods Contracts: master thesis. Aalborg University, 2021. 73 p.
19. Linne A. L., Burden of Proof under Article 35 CISG. In: Pace International Law Review, 2008, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 31–44.
20. Mai N. K. Exclusion and Limitation of Liability for Non-Conformity of Goods: A Comparative Study on CISG, UCC and UK Law: PhD thesis. 2017. 115 p.
21. Pamboukis Ch. The Concept and Function of Usages in the United Nations Convention on International Sale of Goods. In: Journal of Law and Commerce, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 107–131.
22. Roland D. Sales and Conformity of Goods: A Legal Discourse, Banking and Finance. MURG Micheal, 2020, pp. 1–20.
23. Ruangvichathorn J. The Harmonization of ASEAN Sales Law: A Comparative Study with Thai Sales Law and CISG. In: Thammasat Business Law Journal, 2020, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 131–147.
24. Saidov D. Article 35 of the CISG: Reflecting on the Present and Thinking About the Future. In: Villanova Law Review, 2014, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 529–552.
25. Schlechtriem P., Butler P. UN Law on International Sales. Springer, 2009. 351 p.
26. Schwenzer I. Conformity of the Goods – Physical Features on the Wane? In: Conference in Honour of Peter Schlectriem 1933–2007: the 3rd Annual MAA Schlectriem CISG Conference. Hague, 2012, pp. 103–112.
27. Schwenzer I. Ethical Standards in CISG Contracts. In: Uniform Law Review, 2017, no. 22 (1), pp. 122– 131.
28. Shabanı F. Non-conformity of Goods in Light of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and the Law on Obligations of the Republic of Macedonia as Part of South- Eastern European Law. In: Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2015, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 85–88.
29. Oktaviandra S. Indonesia and Its Reluctance to Ratify the United Nations Convention on Contracts For the International Sale of Goods(CISG). In: Indonesia Law Review, 2018, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 243–255.
30. Yarar A. İ. Conformity of Goods in International Sales Under CISG and English Law: LLM thesis. Amsterdam, 2016. 69 p.
31. Williams J. Analysis of CISG Article 35 – Conformity of the Goods in the Changing Power Dynamics of Corporate Social Responsibility, Trade Development Through Harmonization of Commercial Law. In: Comparative Law Journal of the Pacific, 2015, vol. XIX, pp. 299–306.