Preview

Moscow Juridical Journal

Advanced search

Ensuring Biosecurity as a Constitutional and Legal Narrative for Public Administration

https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6794-2023-2-20-30

Abstract

Aim. To reveal the features of the constitutional and legal narrative “ensuring biological safety, to con­sider the theoretical and applied aspects of its understanding.  

Methodology. The dialectical and legal approach to the cognition of the constitutional and legal narra­tive “ensuring biological safety” were used, which determined the choice of the following methods of cognition: formal logical, formal legal, system analysis and comparative legal.  

Results. The characteristic of the concept of constitutional and legal narrative is presented. Theoretical, legal and methodological features of the constitutional and legal narrative “ensuring biological safety” are revealed, and its significance is shown.  

Research implications. The theory of public law has been developed. The results can be used in the work of bodies exercising public administration.

About the Author

I. A. Aleshkova
Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences; RUDN University named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation

Irina A. Aleshkova – Cand. Sci.(Law), Senior Researcher, Department of Jurisprudence; Assoc. Prof., Department of Land and Environmental Law, Law Institute

Nakhimovsky prospect 51/21, Moscow 117418



References

1. Agafonov V. B., Zhavoronkova N. G.[Ecological and legal regulation of genetic engineering activities in the Russian Federation: modern problems and development prospects].In: Aktualnyye problemy rossiyskogo prava [Actual problems of Russian law], 2021, no. 6, pp. 149–157.

2. Alferov O. L., Alferova E. V.[“Taming” the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Legal Approaches to Combating Coronavirus in Italy, the United States, and China].In: Sotsialnyye i gumanitarnyye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 4: Gosudarstvo i pravo [Social and Humanitarian Sciences.Domestic and foreign literature.Series 4: State and Law], 2022, no. 1, pp. 153–165.

3. Arkhipova E. Yu.[Balance of private and public interests in legal regulation].In: Aktualnyye problemy gosudarstva i prava [Actual problems of state and law], 2022, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 132–139. DOI: 10.20310/2587-9340-2022-6-2-132-139

4. Gaponenko V. F., Alaberdeev V. F.[National-state interests in the system of relations of economic security of the oil and gas complex of Russia].In: Problemy obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy i informatsionnoy bezopasnosti: materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Vyp. 3 [Problems of ensuring economic and information security: Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference.Iss. 3].Omsk, 2019, pp. 26–30.

5. Zhavoronkova N. G., Agafonov V. B.[Theoretical and methodological problems of legal support of ecological, biospheric and genetic security in the national security system of the Russian Federation].In: Lex Russica, 2019, no. 9, pp. 96–108.

6. Mokhov A. A.[The concept of three “BIO” (biotechnology, biosafety, bioeconomics) and its legal support].In: Yurist [Lawyer], 2020, no. 4, pp. 9–15.

7. Umnova-Konyukhova I. A.[Principles of constitutional law in the 21st century: assessment and development forecasts in scientific schools of generology of law, legal and constitutional futurology].In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Yurisprudentsiya [Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University.Series: Jurisprudence], 2022, no. 1, pp. 15–28. DOI: 10.18384/2310-6794-2022-1-15-28

8. Umnova-Konyukhova I. A.[Constitutional foundations of Russian social law: state and prospects of formation].In: Konstitutsionnoye i munitsipalnoye pravo [Constitutional and municipal law], 2022, no. 10, pp. 3–10.

9. Chestnov I. L.[Narrative methodology of post-classical jurisprudence].In: Denisenko V. V., Soboleva A. K., Chestnova I. L., eds.Pravo i narrativy [Law and narratives].Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2022, pp. 34.

10. Churilov A. Yu.[On the question of the significance of narratives for lawmaking in the era of progressive development of technology].In: Yurist [Lawyer], 2022, no. 11, pp. 66–72.

11. Armeni Ch.Narratives as Tools of Legal Re-Imagination in the Climate Crisis.In: Journal of Environmental Law, 2021, vol. 33, iss. 2, pp. 485–494.

12. Cao C.China’s evolving biosafety/biosecurity legislations. In: Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2021, vol. 8, iss. 1, pp. 1–21.

13. Vakula M. A., Umnova-Koniukhova I. A.Environmental Safety of Urbanized Territories as a Developing Institution for Ensuring the Vital Interests of Mankind. In: Vasenev V., Dovletyarova E., Valentini R., et al.Advanced Technologies for Sustainable Development of Urban Green Infrastructure: Proceedings of Smart and Sustainable Cities 2020.Cham, Springer, 2021, pp. 261–271.

14. Vito De Lucia.Competing Narratives and Complex Genealogies: The Ecosystem Approach in International Environmental Law. In: Journal of Environmental Law, 2015, vol. 27, iss. 1, pp. 91–117.

15.


Review

Views: 237


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5091 (Print)
ISSN 2949-513X (Online)