INTERACTION AND INTERCONNECTION OF EU LEGAL SYSTEM WITH THE LEGAL SYSTEMS OF THE INCORPORATED STATES
Abstract
The article deals with the EU legal
system relations with the legal systems of its member
states. There have been ways and forms of influence
of European law on national. The expansion of the
regulatory impact of European Union law on public relations
has been pointed out, as well as the increase in
the number of normative legal acts of a supranational
nature. The author suggests his own view of the peculiarities
of the EU legal system.
system relations with the legal systems of its member
states. There have been ways and forms of influence
of European law on national. The expansion of the
regulatory impact of European Union law on public relations
has been pointed out, as well as the increase in
the number of normative legal acts of a supranational
nature. The author suggests his own view of the peculiarities
of the EU legal system.
About the Author
Михаил Марченко
Московский государственный областной университет
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Горник Г. Витвицкая О . Право Европейского союза. М., 2005.
2. Европейское право / рук. авт. колл. и отв. ред. Л .М. Энтин. М., 2004.
3. Право Европейского союза / под ред. С .Ю. Кашкина. М., 2004. С . 106.
4. Топорнин Б .Н. Европейское право. М., 1998. С . 301.
5. Хартли Т.К. Основы права Европейского сообщества. М., 1998.
6. Andenas M.and Usher J. The Treaty of Nice and Beyond. Oxford, 2003.
7. Bartolini S t. Restructuring Europe. Oxford, 2005.
8. Claudina R . The Supremacy of Community Law Before the French Constitutional.
9. Court // European Law Review. 2006.
10. Cichowski R . The European Court and Civil Society Litigation. Mobilization and Governance. Cambridge, 2007. P. 43-46.
11. Cichowski R . The European Court and Civil Society Litigation. Mobilization and Governance. Cambridge, 2007. P. 43-46.
12. Darbyshire P. English Legal System. L ., 2005. P. 53, 54.
13. Fabio U. The Allocation of Competences Between the European Union and Its Member States // Andenas M. and Usher J. The Treaty of Nice and Beyond. Oxford, 2003.
14. Hofmann H . and Turk A. EU Administrative Governance. Northampton, 2006.
15. Kohler-Koch B . (ed.). Linking EU and National Governance. Oxford, 2003. P.53.
16. Kumm M. The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe Before and After the Constitutional Treaty. European Law Journal. 2005. № 3. 15. Lenaerts K. Nuffel P. Constitutional Law of the European Union L ., 2005. P. 325.
17. Ladeur K.-H. C onflict and Cooperation Between European Law and the General Administrative Law of the Member States // L adeur K.-H. E uropeanization of Administrative Law. Transforming National Decision-making Procedures. Sydney, 2002.
18. Ladeur K.-H. Flexibility and "Cooperative L aw"; The Coordination of European Member States Law. The Example of Environmental Law // Burca G. Scott J. Constitutional Change in the E U. From Uniformity to Flexibility? Oxford, 2001.
19. Maurer A. Mittag J. and Wessels W. National Systems' Adaptation to the EU System: Trends, Offers and Constraints // Kohler-Koch B . (eds.). Linking EU and National Governance. Oxford, 2003. P. 57.
20. Murray Ph. The European Transformation of the National State // Murray Ph. an Holmes L . (eds.) Europe: Rethinking and Boundaries. Sydney, 1998.
21. Schendelen R . Machiavelli in Brussels. The Art of Lobbying the EU. Amsterdam, 2002. P. 31.
22. Schiemann K. Europe and the Loss of Sovereignty // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2007. Part. 3. Vol. 56. P. 485.
23. Schmidt V . The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford, 2002. P. 303.
24. Schutter O . and Deakin S . (eds.). Social Rights and Market Forces: is the Open Coordination of Employment and Social Policies the Future of Social Europe? Brusselles, 2005.
25. Steyger E . National Traditions and European Community Law. Sydney, 1997.
26. Tiersky R . Introduction: Euro-skepticism and «Europe» // Tiersky R. (ed.). uroskepticism. A Reader. O xford, 2001.
27. Ullrich H . (ed.). The Evolution of European Competition Law. Whose Regulation, Which Competition? Northampton, 2006.
Review
Views:
106
Email this article 